I recently moved into a new apartment in Maputo, having succeeded in dragging my Brazilian love to this slice of Latin America in Africa. It's my third abode in the city, and I'm steadily moving up (from the 2nd floor to the 5th, to the 14th), and further north, albeit remaining on the same street. Our view is nothing short of amazing, and in the past weekend, I was loathe even to leave the comfort of the balcony to venture elsewhere in the city. With some slightly aged balcony couches, a few long surviving plants, a fresh breeze and a sea view all the way to the horizon, it makes for a peaceful retreat- apart from the noisy quad racers on Friedrich Engels (honestly- isn't there plenty of quad terrain around for them, without deafening the good citizens of the city?) and the occasional impromptu African hip hop party breaking out below.
We've been lucky to find this place - decent apartments with views in Maputo where the landlord is not uber-greedy and demanding monthly rents on a par with Dublin, are not easy to come by. The new arrival to Maputo is unlikely to find one of these, but an older hand like me lies in wait for exiting friends.. and pounces.. inheriting not only the apartment, but the associated paraphernalia (I have a step machine in my spare room, and old Halloween costumes in a cupboard/room off the kitchen).
Other friends have not been so lucky recently with their homes, with landlords pushing up the rent way beyond what is reasonable for buildings with only occasionally functioning lifts, and dilapidated stairwells. Those features, one of course expects from a country low down on the human development index- just not for $3000 dollars per month. The exchange of money and services requires two willing parties though, and in this case, it's often the aid agencies, and embassies spending their cash on housing subsidies which offer almost no incentive to employees to opt for a cheaper place. In some cases, the organisations pays all of the rent; in others, the employee pays up to a specific amount (say $1500), and the organisation pays everything else - sometimes with no upper limit, so of course many people prefer to take the apartment for $2500, and let the organisation (or let's be clear about it - homebased taxpayers) foot the bill for the rest. And this comes on top of what are usually very generous salaries....
I understand of course the desire to house employees in safe, comfortable accommodation, but it seems that even in an age of budget cuts and decreases in financial assistance provided to developing countries, little, to no attention is paid to the vast sums of money spent in this way, nor to the implications it has for housing markets in the host countries.